三泰虎

印度最高法院要求政府:考慮推遲實施新農業法

 Consider putting on hold new farm laws: Supreme Court to govt

最高法院要求政府:考慮推遲實施新農業法

 9d9e0d8fly1glswco4qr0j20dr0a9wkp.jpg

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre to consider deferring implementation of the contentious farm laws as a step towards resumption of dialogue with agri unions opposing the legislations.

新德里:周四,印度最高法院要求中央政府考慮推遲實施存爭議的新農業法,以便與反對立法的農業工會恢復對話。

Attorney general K K Venugopal’s immediate response was, “That (deferring) is not possible”. When the apex court bench said the go nment could consider this to help resume stalled talks, he relented and said he would discuss with the Centre.

司法部長K K Venugopal立即回應:“那(推遲)是不可能的”。當最高法院法官表示政府可以考慮恢復停滯的談判時,他的態度有所緩和,并表示他將與中央進行討論。

The court also observed the farmers’ constitutional right to protest could not impede citizens’ right to free movement.

法院還指出,憲法賦予農民抗議的權利,不能妨礙公民自 由行動的權利。

In its comments, the court held up the farm unions’ right to protest but also noted that talks were needed or else the protest could drag on without results. It also noted that the right to protest should not infringe upon the right of other citizens to go about their daily lives and businesses.

法院在聲明中支持農民抗議的權利,但也指出,有必要進行談判,否則抗議可能會拖下去,而且沒有結果。它還指出,抗議不應干擾其他公民的日常生活和工作。

Importantly, the bench said the SC would not interfere with the farm protests. "Indeed, the right to protest is part of a fundamental right and can, as a matter of fact, be exercised subject to public order. There can certainly be no impediment in the exercise of such rights as long as it is non-violent and does not result in damage to life and property of other citizens and is in accordance with law. We are of the view at this stage that the farmers’ protest should be allowed to continue without impediment and without any breach of peace either by the protesters or the police," the CJI-led bench said.

重要的是,法官表示最高法院不會干預農民抗議活動。“的確,抗議權是一項基本權利,事實上,可以遵守公共秩序的約束下行使。只要是非暴麗的,不會對其他公民的生命和財產造成損害,并且是符合法律的,就不妨礙這種權利的行使。我們的觀點是,允許現階段農民的抗議不受阻礙地繼續下去,無論是抗議者還是警察都不能破壞和平。”

The tone for the rest of the hearing was set by senior advocate Harish Salve, who appeared for a Delhi resident. He said, "No one has a quarrel with the right of farmers to protest against the farm laws. But the question is, can it be at the cost of fundamental rights of other citizens? Citizens' right to life is affected by the blockade of highways, which is impeding supply of food grains, vegetables and other essential commodities. Prices are soaring. This has affected the middle class which is facing a tough time due to the pandemic.

高級辯護律師哈里什·薩維(Harish Salve)提出了不同的看法,他說:“沒有人反對農民抗議的權利。問題是,能以犧牲其他公民的基本權利為代價嗎? 高速公路被封鎖,危及了公民的生命權,阻礙了糧食、蔬菜和其他基本商品的供應,物價正在飛漲。這影響了中產階級,由于疫情,他們正面臨艱難時期。”

印度時報讀者的評論:

譯文來源:三泰虎 http://www.254983.tw/p/51562.html   譯者:Jessica.Wu

Ajinkya Taware

What business does the SC have? Their job is to follow the Constitution and they should stick to that.

最高法院該干什么?

他們的職責是維護憲法。

 

nandan

Tha law is passed by Parliamentart and its constitutionally correct why SC put on Hold?

法律是議會通過的,而且符合憲法的規定,為什么最高法院要求推遲實施?

 

Jai Hind

who ever have this suggestion is unfit to be judge and even a lawyer !!!! can't they understand its implications on future are they promting Street protests for every issues in future

提出這種建議的人不適合做法官甚至是律師!!!!

難道他們不理解這會對今后造成什么影響嗎?

難道他們是在鼓勵街頭抗議嗎?

以后一有問題就上街抗議?

 

Achyut Bal

How come all farmers now wear sikh turbans? I never saw them wear those in Maharashtra.

為什么現在所有的農民都戴錫克教頭巾?

在馬哈拉施特拉邦,我從來沒見過他們戴。

 

Mark

Finally the voice of common men is being listened to. Thanks SC for uphelling the fundamentals and not bowing down to tyrants who have destroyed the nation

最終,普通人的呼聲得到了傾聽。感謝最高法院堅持基本原則,不向破壞國家的暴君低頭

 

Joe Kool

This is an abuse of the law by the rioters (protestors).

STOP BLOCKING THE ROADS.

暴亂者(抗議者)濫用法律。

別堵路了。

 

Sanjoy Pandey

The elected Parliament is for the purpose of creating laws for the benefit of the people or the country. A handful of persons sponsored by the opposition can't create chaos to weaken the country.

民選議會為維護人民或國家的利益而制定法律。一小撮由反對派支持的人不該制造混亂。

 

Pavan

This farm law must be implemented as soon as possible! This is clearly a politically paid protest to derail a law passed by parliament! Government must move forward as this farm bill helps majority of the farmers! Jai Hind!

我們必須盡快實施新農業法!

這些抗議顯然是有政治目的的,目的是阻撓議會通過法律!

政府必須向前推進,新農業法案幫助了大多數農民!

印度必勝!

 

vigneshwar shankar

Ridiculous!!! This is not a case of co ption!! The SC must know its limits

可笑! !

這不是附敗案!!

最高法院得有分寸

 

V Kumaresan

The law that is being implemented by the go nment is the law that was passed through the due process of law and SC has no business to meddle with it.

政府將要實施的法律是經過正當法律程序的,最高法院無權干涉。

 

vempati Ratna Joshi

I fully support the new farm laws

我完全支持新農業法

 

Hari Sud

Our very respected farmers, who always want something by offering nothing in return. They want all their debt to be remitted. They want a lot more agricultural inputs free, a few of these are already free.

備受尊重的農民總是要求這要求那,卻沒有任何貢獻。他們要求免除債務,其中一些已經免費了。

 

ProudIndian

God knows why this protest is!! Protest should be by middle class , who are poorer than these big farmers/brokers of Punjab, and still paying income tax unlike these spoilt lots.

I wouls requst go nment to tax these idiots.

天知道為什么會發生這種抗議!

該發起抗議的是中產階級,他們比旁遮普邦的大農場主/中間商更窮,

他們還得繳納所得稅,不像這些被寵壞的人。我要求政府對這些白癡征稅。

 

Guest satish bakshi

If everything honourable SC has to decide, what for the govt is elected?

如果所有事情都必須油最高法院決定,那政府拿來干嘛?

 

Go India Go

The entire nation will protest on the streets if the farm laws are put on hold!

如果農業法被推遲實施,全國人民將上街抗議!

 

Gaana User

What ever be the truth... Only go nment have to make compromise... This is India. Public wants everything for free... Dont know which other country is providing them such benefits..

無論如何,印度政府不得不做出妥協,這就是印度。公眾想要免費的一切…不知道有哪個國家給能他們提供這樣的福利…

 

Sam

What if the same protestors say they dont want Supreme court and want to close it for good?

如果抗議者說他們不想要最高法院,想要永久關閉最高法院呢?

 

Vythinathan Duraiswamy

Charge the farmers in court for public nuisance, hindrance to other citizens, and recover losses to Govt and all other parties.

將農民告上法庭,起訴他們妨害公眾利益、妨礙其他公民利益,要求他們并向政府和其他各方賠償損失。

三泰虎原創譯文,禁止轉載?。?a href="http://www.254983.tw/">首頁 > 資訊 » 印度最高法院要求政府:考慮推遲實施新農業法

()
分享到:

快乐双彩开奖结果查询 央行关闭比特币平台 云南11选5开奖结果图 天津11选5前三直遗漏数据 tcp手游棋牌可靠吗 内蒙古体彩时时彩泳坛夺金 莱特币主要交易平台 天星山西麻将下载 emba报考条件及费用 东北麻将技巧视频 湖南闲来麻将下载苹果 pp电子娱乐平台—点击进入 排列5开奖号码基本走势图 海南七星彩 nba比分网址 陕西快乐10分技巧 打现金捕鱼游戏下载