Sex on marriage promise is not always rape: Delhi HC



NEW DELHI: Sex on promise of marriage doesn’t constitute rape if the woman continues to have consensual physical intimacy over a long period of time, Delhi High Court has observed.


Quashing a rape case filed by a woman who off and on had a physical relationship with a man for months, the court noted, “A promise of marriage cannot be held as an inducement for engaging in sex over a protracted and indefinite period of time.”


Justice Vibhu Bakhru noted that sexual relationships could be said to be induced on false promise of marriage if the victim fell prey to it momentarily. “In certain cases, a promise of marriage may induce a party to agree to establish sexual relations, even though the party does not desire to consent to the same. Such inducement in a given moment may elicit consent, even though the concerned party may want to say no,” the court explained.

法官Vibhu Bakhru指出,如果受害者一時上當受騙,那么他們的性關系可被認為是由虛假的婚姻承諾誘發的。法院解釋道:“在某些情況下,結婚承諾可能誘使一方同意發生性關系,即使該方并不想同意。即使她想說“不”,但在某一時刻由于這種引誘,仍會同意。”

Only in such cases a false promise to marry with the intention to exploit the other party “may vitiate consent and, thus, constitute an offence of rape under Indian Penal Code section 375”, it added.


But when there is a continuing intimate relationship, “which also involves engaging in sexual activity over a significant period of time,” the same can’t be seen as “involuntary and secured not by affection but only on the lure of marriage,” it observed.


Justice Bakhru upheld a trial court order acquitting the man of rape charge. It was hearing an appeal by the woman, who claimed the accused had cheated her and established repeated physical relation by making a false promise of marriage and had left her for another woman.


The high court said it was evident that the woman established physical relations on her own free will and accord as she had genuine affection for him. It agreed with the finding of the trial court that her consent for physical relations had not been obtained by making any promise of marriage, but talks of marriage, if any, took place later.



譯文來源:三泰虎 http://www.254983.tw/p/51557.html   譯者:Jessica.Wu


Great judgement and it's a big blow to those girls who initiate to make false allegations against their boyfriends to implicate them in rape charges..



Vipul Sharma

Very good judgement. Actually the definition of Rape needs to be revised in view changing society. Labelling consensual sex as Rape actually dilutes the crime




Lucky Narula

What about the punishment to women for false allegations.. Its very easy for a female to get away by putting false allegations, but have you ever thought about the Boy and his family.. And what about the boy, his life is ruined..





Anil Dharan

Sensible Decision, for once.



vijay thommandra

Any woman who is prepared to have sexual relationship before marriage should take the consent of marriage in writing before indulging in sex.




A very welcome judgement!



Mango Peepal

Finally! This judgement is trying to provoke me to see the judiciary in a different, better light. Bravo!




Girls should not indulge in sex before marriage. If they want to, then it should be their own enjoyment, and not as a bait for the guy to marry them.




why girls don't get promise in writing on 1000? stamp paper and go to bed With boy,,,????



Bal Gopal

Consensual sex should not be considered as rape even if the woman/man decides to break up. Every man/woman must consider repercussions before indulging in sexual activity.



Tsr The Urbanist

Wish SC also defines the timelines for the disposal of Rape related cases within 90 days to cut down on the mental agony the victim undergoes



Bonny Moraes

Its common sense. Sex before marriage is not uncommon, it is like taking sample. According to me it is necessary. If you are going to spend a lifetime with your partner, you’ve have to know what you are in for.



Ramachandran S

It is safe for women to marry first before having physical relationship. if only marriage is the goal, why dont you wait till marriage.




Dilip J

Firstly it is totally immoral and against natural world laws, to have sex before marriage. Modern concept of live-in relations and then decide to get married or not like most bollywood are doing copying the western stars, so are the young fools doing it for fun, and parents glaring at their relations



John K V

this is very good decision by the SC. which decent lady will agree to have intimate sex before marriage. so young ladies be careful



Keep Smiling

Absolutely correct verdict.

The person should file a defamation suit.




Why do woman give their chhhhoooooot before marriage



Zulfa B.

Why women give into men at all on mere promise of marriage? They should insist on marriage first.

為什么女性僅僅因為對方承諾娶她就向男人屈服呢? 她們應該堅持結婚之后再發生關系。

三泰虎原創譯文,禁止轉載?。?a href="http://www.254983.tw/">首頁 > 資訊 » 德里高等法院:承諾結婚后發生的性行為不一定構成強奸


快乐双彩开奖结果查询 怎么买股票 新疆11选511号下午推荐 上彩票二分彩 为什么理财收益一直下降 有双色球中奖的彩票软件 浙江快乐12选5技巧 体彩20选5中奖说明 云南快乐10分规则 全民欢乐捕鱼好玩吗 福建福利彩票官方网站 彩票平台架设 急速赛车怎么玩才能赚大钱 广西快乐10分 中国男子排球比分直播 二分彩是什么规律 广西快乐十分开奘结果