三泰虎

德里高等法院:承諾結婚后發生的性行為不一定構成強奸

 Sex on marriage promise is not always rape: Delhi HC

德里高等法院:承諾結婚后發生性行為不一定構成強奸

 9d9e0d8fly1glrpvk095cj20dp0acdlo.jpg

NEW DELHI: Sex on promise of marriage doesn’t constitute rape if the woman continues to have consensual physical intimacy over a long period of time, Delhi High Court has observed.

新德里:德里高等法院指出,如果女方在很長一段時間內自愿發生身體親密行為,那么在承諾結婚的情況下發生性行為不構成強奸。

Quashing a rape case filed by a woman who off and on had a physical relationship with a man for months, the court noted, “A promise of marriage cannot be held as an inducement for engaging in sex over a protracted and indefinite period of time.”

法院撤銷了由一名女子提起的強奸案,該女子與一名男子持續數月保持親密關系,法院指出,“婚姻承諾不能視為在長時間內發生性行為的誘因。”

Justice Vibhu Bakhru noted that sexual relationships could be said to be induced on false promise of marriage if the victim fell prey to it momentarily. “In certain cases, a promise of marriage may induce a party to agree to establish sexual relations, even though the party does not desire to consent to the same. Such inducement in a given moment may elicit consent, even though the concerned party may want to say no,” the court explained.

法官Vibhu Bakhru指出,如果受害者一時上當受騙,那么他們的性關系可被認為是由虛假的婚姻承諾誘發的。法院解釋道:“在某些情況下,結婚承諾可能誘使一方同意發生性關系,即使該方并不想同意。即使她想說“不”,但在某一時刻由于這種引誘,仍會同意。”

Only in such cases a false promise to marry with the intention to exploit the other party “may vitiate consent and, thus, constitute an offence of rape under Indian Penal Code section 375”, it added.

法院補充說,只有在這種情況下,以引誘對方為目的作出虛假結婚承諾,“即使對方同意,這種同意也無效,根據印度刑法第375章,這構成強奸罪”。

But when there is a continuing intimate relationship, “which also involves engaging in sexual activity over a significant period of time,” the same can’t be seen as “involuntary and secured not by affection but only on the lure of marriage,” it observed.

但法院指出,當親密關系維持很長一段時間,“還涉及性行為”時,就不能把這種關系視為“非自愿的,不是靠感情而是靠婚姻誘惑而達成的。”

Justice Bakhru upheld a trial court order acquitting the man of rape charge. It was hearing an appeal by the woman, who claimed the accused had cheated her and established repeated physical relation by making a false promise of marriage and had left her for another woman.

法官巴克赫魯維持了初審法院的判決,宣布被控強奸的這名男子無罪。女方稱被告欺騙了她,欺騙她會結婚而多次發生關系,之后卻離開她和另一個女人在一起。

The high court said it was evident that the woman established physical relations on her own free will and accord as she had genuine affection for him. It agreed with the finding of the trial court that her consent for physical relations had not been obtained by making any promise of marriage, but talks of marriage, if any, took place later.

高等法院表示,很明顯,這名女子是自愿發生關系的,因為她對男方有真正的感情。高等法院同意初審法院的判決,即她并非是聽到結婚承諾而同意發生關系,只不過有談婚論嫁。

印度時報讀者的評論:

譯文來源:三泰虎 http://www.254983.tw/p/51557.html   譯者:Jessica.Wu

A R S

Great judgement and it's a big blow to those girls who initiate to make false allegations against their boyfriends to implicate them in rape charges..

判得好,對那些指控男友強奸的女孩來說是一個巨大的打擊。

 

Vipul Sharma

Very good judgement. Actually the definition of Rape needs to be revised in view changing society. Labelling consensual sex as Rape actually dilutes the crime

判得好。事實上,隨著社會的變化,強奸的定義需要修改。

把兩廂情愿的性行為貼上強奸的標簽實際上是把這種罪行淡化了

 

Lucky Narula

What about the punishment to women for false allegations.. Its very easy for a female to get away by putting false allegations, but have you ever thought about the Boy and his family.. And what about the boy, his life is ruined..

女性誣告會受到怎樣的懲罰呢?

女性誣告隨便都能免于責罰,

但有沒有想過男方和他的家庭,他的生活被毀了…

 

Anil Dharan

Sensible Decision, for once.

明智的判決,僅此一次。

 

vijay thommandra

Any woman who is prepared to have sexual relationship before marriage should take the consent of marriage in writing before indulging in sex.

準備在婚前發生性關系的女性,在發生性行為之前,都應先取得男方的書面結婚承諾。

 

Guest

A very welcome judgement!

非常受歡迎的判決!

 

Mango Peepal

Finally! This judgement is trying to provoke me to see the judiciary in a different, better light. Bravo!

這一判決促使我對印度司法另眼相看。好樣的!

 

lets_become_real

Girls should not indulge in sex before marriage. If they want to, then it should be their own enjoyment, and not as a bait for the guy to marry them.

女孩子在婚前不應該發生性行為。如果她們愿意,那應該是兩廂情愿,而不是以此為誘餌要求男方娶她。

 

CHANDRASHEKHAR giri

why girls don't get promise in writing on 1000? stamp paper and go to bed With boy,,,????

為什么女方不能在登記結婚后,再和男方上床…????

 

Bal Gopal

Consensual sex should not be considered as rape even if the woman/man decides to break up. Every man/woman must consider repercussions before indulging in sexual activity.

即使女方/男方決定分手,兩廂情愿的性行為也不應被視為強奸。雙方在發生性行為之前必須考慮后果。

 

Tsr The Urbanist

Wish SC also defines the timelines for the disposal of Rape related cases within 90 days to cut down on the mental agony the victim undergoes

希望最高法院能規定90天內處理與強奸有關的案件的時限,以減少受害者遭受的精神痛苦

 

Bonny Moraes

Its common sense. Sex before marriage is not uncommon, it is like taking sample. According to me it is necessary. If you are going to spend a lifetime with your partner, you’ve have to know what you are in for.

這是常識?;榍靶孕袨椴⒉簧僖?,在我看來,這是必要的。如果你打算和你的伴侶共度一生,你必須知道對方怎么樣。

 

Ramachandran S

It is safe for women to marry first before having physical relationship. if only marriage is the goal, why dont you wait till marriage.

女性在結婚后發生關系才保險。

如果結婚是唯一的目標,為什么不能等到結婚。

 

Dilip J

Firstly it is totally immoral and against natural world laws, to have sex before marriage. Modern concept of live-in relations and then decide to get married or not like most bollywood are doing copying the western stars, so are the young fools doing it for fun, and parents glaring at their relations

首先,婚前性行為是完全不道德的,是違反自然規律的。像大多數寶萊塢電影演的那樣,年輕的傻瓜們這樣做是為了好玩,父母們則對他們的關系感到憤怒

 

John K V

this is very good decision by the SC. which decent lady will agree to have intimate sex before marriage. so young ladies be careful

太好了,哪個正經的女人會同意在婚前發生親密的性行為?年輕的女士們要小心了

 

Keep Smiling

Absolutely correct verdict.

The person should file a defamation suit.

絕對正確的裁決。應該起訴女方誹謗。

 

EXPERT OPINION

Why do woman give their chhhhoooooot before marriage

女性為什么要在結婚前獻出自己?

 

Zulfa B.

Why women give into men at all on mere promise of marriage? They should insist on marriage first.

為什么女性僅僅因為對方承諾娶她就向男人屈服呢? 她們應該堅持結婚之后再發生關系。

三泰虎原創譯文,禁止轉載?。?a href="http://www.254983.tw/">首頁 > 資訊 » 德里高等法院:承諾結婚后發生的性行為不一定構成強奸

()
分享到:

快乐双彩开奖结果查询 怎么买股票 新疆11选511号下午推荐 上彩票二分彩 为什么理财收益一直下降 有双色球中奖的彩票软件 浙江快乐12选5技巧 体彩20选5中奖说明 云南快乐10分规则 全民欢乐捕鱼好玩吗 福建福利彩票官方网站 彩票平台架设 急速赛车怎么玩才能赚大钱 广西快乐10分 中国男子排球比分直播 二分彩是什么规律 广西快乐十分开奘结果